Services / 03

IoT Integration & Automated Insights

Sensor data that ends in a recommended action, not a chart. Dashboards, anomaly alerts and predictive maintenance for equipment and sites that cannot afford surprises.

Who this is for

The problem, stated plainly

IoT projects fail at the last step. Sensors get installed, data flows to a cloud account, a dashboard gets built, and then nobody looks at it, because a dashboard asks a busy person to notice something. The information exists and the decision still does not happen.

An aircraft cockpit solved this with the annunciator panel: nothing lights up until something needs a decision, and when it lights up it tells the crew what to do. The same design applies to a factory floor or a fleet of pumps. Alert on the exception, attach the action, stay quiet otherwise.

What we build

Sensor-to-cloud integration

Temperature, humidity, vibration, current, pressure and flow from new or existing sensors, streamed to the cloud, stored and made queryable. Retrofitting legacy equipment with clamp-on or wireless sensors is routine; we design the data model so the readings still mean something in five years.

Real-time dashboards built for the person on shift

Grafana, Power BI or a custom web view, with the layout designed around the decision the viewer has to make and readable on a phone in a plant. We spend more time on what to leave off a dashboard than on what to put on it.

Predictive maintenance models

Models that read the early signature of failure in vibration, temperature or current trends and estimate the remaining useful life, so maintenance is scheduled by condition rather than by calendar. The target is zero unplanned stoppage; the honest early result is usually a large drop in surprise failures and a clearer view of which assets deserve the attention.

Alerts with a recommended next action

When a threshold or model flags an anomaly, the alert goes by Slack, Teams, email or SMS to the person who can act, with the recommended response drawn from your maintenance history attached. Alert fatigue is a design failure, so thresholds, escalation and quiet hours are tuned with the people who receive them.

Where the aviation model shows

Aircraft have monitored their own health for decades: engine parameters trended after every flight, alerts prioritized by what the crew must do now versus at the next stop. Condition-based maintenance is the airline norm, not a novelty. We bring that discipline, and its caution about false alarms, to equipment that has never had it.

The general principle, that "be careful" is not a corrective action and the mechanism has to do the noticing, is in what aviation safety practice teaches other operations.

How an engagement runs

StageWhat happensWhat you get
Free consultation (30 min)Inventory of sensors, equipment and the data you already collectA proposal for what to do with the data you have
Workflow improvement, implemented (from ¥50,000, about 2 weeks)Existing data analyzed; a first dashboard and alert rulesThe first alerts running, and the gain measured
Whole-operation architecture, implemented (from ¥300,000)Sensor integration, predictive models, alert routingA monitoring system your team owns
Operate and improve (from ¥20,000 / month)Threshold tuning, model retraining, new assets onboardedAlerts people still trust a year later

Figures are indicative. Where you have no sensors yet, we start with a walk-through of the equipment to decide which measurements would actually change a decision.

What this will not do

Predictive maintenance needs failure history to predict failure. If an asset has never failed in the data, the model can flag abnormality but not name the fault. We are also careful about the difference between a correlation in sensor data and a cause on the machine; the model proposes, the maintenance engineer confirms.

Frequently asked questions

We already have sensors and a dashboard. What would you add?

Usually the last two steps: anomaly detection that decides when something deserves attention, and alerts that arrive with the recommended action. Most existing dashboards are fine; the problem is that they wait to be looked at.

Which platforms do you work with?

AWS, Google Cloud and Azure IoT services, plus Grafana, Power BI and custom web dashboards. For sensors and gateways we work with what you have or specify hardware that fits the environment; we are not tied to a vendor.

How long until predictive maintenance is useful?

Threshold-based alerts are useful within the PoC. Model-based prediction needs months of data that include the failures you want to predict, so it matures over the first year of operation. We are explicit about that timeline in the proposal.

Can the alerts reach people who are not at a desk?

Yes. Slack, Teams, email and SMS are standard, and the dashboard is designed for a phone. The point is to reach the person on shift, not the manager's inbox.

Book a free 30-minute consultation

Bring a list of the equipment that worries you.

← All services